Skip to main content
Cognitive Biases

Just Do the Math Fallacy

The belief that one can determine the truth of a claim through simple logical reasoning or calculation, ignoring the possibility of incomplete or incorrect underlying information. This leads to overconfidence in conclusions and a neglect of expert knowledge.

THE IDEA

Why You Can’t “Just Do the Math”

It’s good to think about things. It’s good to try to understand the various arguments around issues of public or personal concern. But to come to better understandings of issues we care about, we rely heavily on the expertise and fair-mindedness of those we read, watch, or listen to.

Take Jill. Jill had a “just do the math” moment with the N95 argument she examined. She read a comparison of virus size with a supposed opening in the filter and concluded that the mask could not work. But the note in the bottle failed to mention a couple of other important things.

  1. The Virus Travels in Respiratory Particles. Filtration concerns the particles carrying the virus, including droplets and smaller aerosols, rather than the size of an isolated virus alone.
  2. Electrostatic Charge. N95 masks have an electrostatic charge that pulls particles toward the fibers, allowing capture of particles smaller than the weave.
  3. Brownian Motion. Random motion contributes to capturing small particles. The stated 3 microns is not a simple boundary separating captured particles from uncaptured ones.

Modeling filtration requires the relevant mechanisms and measurements. A simple size comparison cannot establish effectiveness if it treats the filter as a sieve or misidentifies what a measurement means. Jill needs a better model and reliable information. The F of SIFT—Find a better source—directs her toward explanations grounded in testing and relevant expertise, a skill the authors call “reading expertise.”

When to use it

  • Evaluating the effectiveness of a health treatment based on a single study without considering the full body of evidence.

  • Making an investment decision using only surface-level financial ratios while ignoring market context or expert analysis.

  • Assessing the safety of a new technology based on simple analogies instead of the underlying physics and testing.

  • Determining the accuracy of a news article by only reading the headline rather than seeking context or expert opinion.

FROM THEORY TO EVERYDAY LIFE

In practice

01

Jill's N95 Mask Calculation

Jill compares an isolated virus size of 0.12 microns with a supposed mask opening of 0.3 microns and concludes that an N95 cannot filter it. That comparison misidentifies a filtration test size as a weave opening. It also leaves out respiratory particle size, electrostatic capture, and diffusion. The arithmetic cannot rescue a model that omits how the filter works.

✳

A MOMENT TO REFLECT

Put it to work.

  1. Think of a time when you tried to reason through a problem but later realized you were missing important information. What was missing?

  2. How can you identify when you are being given incomplete 'dots' to connect?

  3. What strategies can you use to verify that you have all relevant information before drawing a conclusion?

Connected ideas

Another lens can bring the same problem into focus.

Often confused with

References

  1. Numerical Simulation of Virus Diffusion in Facemask during Breathing Cycles — Yi, Fengzhi; Qingyong (2005)

CONTINUE THE CONVERSATION

Source texts

  • Verified How to Think Straight, Get Duped Less, and Make Better Decisions about What to Believe Online (Mike Caulfield, Sam Wineburg)
← More cognitive biases