Skip to main content
Cognitive Biases

The Choice Overload

The paradox of choice suggests that having too many options can lead to decision paralysis and dissatisfaction, as demonstrated by Sheena Iyengar's jam experiment where a smaller selection led to higher purchase rates than a larger one.

THE IDEA

THE CHOICE OVERLOAD

WHY YOU SHOULD LIMIT YOUR OPTIONS

Intuitively you might think that more means more. The more options we take into consideration, the better our final decision. The more choices we have, the happier we are. But sometimes the opposite is true: the greater the choice, the higher our expectations – and the more we worry that we will make the wrong decision. It is the so-called paradox of choice that the American business professor Sheena Iyengar demonstrated in an experiment.

In a supermarket she offered a variety of jams for shoppers to try: six different varieties on one day, twenty-four varieties on another. With the smaller selection, 40 percent tried the jams and 30 percent bought a jar. The bigger selection attracted 60 percent of the shoppers, but only 2 percent bought a jar of jam. The conclusion: choice is alluring but confusing.

How do we solve this paradox of choice in our day-to-day lives? The psychology professor Barry Schwarz has a simple recommendation: reduce your choice. For example, in a restaurant, pick the first dish on the menu that you like the look of, and then immediately close the menu. This shortcut may help with a low-stakes choice when further comparison adds little. The reported experiment illustrates that a larger selection can reduce purchasing in a particular setting; it does not show that limiting choice always improves decisions.

When to use it

  • When choosing a restaurant, limit your menu browsing to the first appealing dish.

  • When shopping for a product, set a maximum number of options to consider before making a purchase.

  • In product design, offer a curated selection of choices to customers rather than overwhelming them with many variants.

  • When planning your day, limit the number of activities or decisions to avoid decision fatigue.

FROM THEORY TO EVERYDAY LIFE

In practice

01

Jam Experiment

Sheena Iyengar offered shoppers either 6 or 24 varieties of jam. The smaller selection led to 30% purchasing, while the larger selection only 2% purchased, despite attracting more interest.

✳

A MOMENT TO REFLECT

Put it to work.

  1. Think of a recent decision where you had many options. Did having more choices make you more or less satisfied with your final choice?

  2. In what areas of your life could you reduce the number of options to improve decision quality and satisfaction?

  3. How does the paradox of choice affect your online shopping behavior, such as browsing hundreds of products?

References

  1. Jam Experiment — Sheena Iyengar
  2. Recommendation to reduce choice — Barry Schwarz

CONTINUE THE CONVERSATION

Source texts

  • The Decision Book Fifty Models for Strategic Thinking
← More cognitive biases