Skip to main content
Cognitive Biases

Mood and Stereotyping in Impression Formation

The studies described associate happy mood with greater reliance on stereotypes and sad mood with more attention to individual details. The account also notes that a person who clearly contradicts a stereotype can disrupt that pattern.

THE IDEA

Impression Formation and Stereotyping

In forming an impression of others, we may either rely on detailed information about the target person or simplify the task by drawing on preexisting knowledge structures, such as stereotypes pertaining to the target’s social category (e.g., Brewer, 1988; Fiske & Neuberg, 1990; Macrae, Milne, & Bodenhausen, 1994). Consistent with the mentioned perspective, being in a good mood has been found to increase stereotyping consistently (e.g., Bodenhausen, Kramer, & Süsser, 1994), unless the target person is clearly inconsistent with the stereotype, thus undermining the applicability of the general knowledge structure (e.g. Bless, Schwarz, & Wieland, 1996). In contrast, being in a sad mood reliably decreases stereotyping and increases the use of individuating information (for a review, see Bless, Schwarz, & Kemmelmeier, 1996). Across many person-perception tasks, individuals in a chronic or temporary sad mood have been found to make more use of detailed individuating information, show less halo effects, and are less influenced by the order of information presentation and more accurate in performance appraisals than individuals in a happy mood, with individuals in a neutral mood falling in between (see Sinclair & Mark, 1992 for a review). Similar findings have been obtained for individuals’ reliance on scripts pertaining to typical situations (such as having dinner in a restaurant) versus their reliance on what actually transpired in the situation (Bless et al., 1996a). Throughout, individuals in a good mood are more likely to rely on preexisting general knowledge structures, proceeding on a “businessas-usual” routine; conversely, individuals in a sad mood are more likely to pay close attention to the specifics at hand, much as one would expect when negative feelings provide a problem signal.

When to use it

  • A hiring manager can check whether mood is affecting an impression and evaluate every candidate against the same evidence and criteria.

  • During jury deliberations, being aware of mood's impact can help jurors evaluate evidence more objectively.

  • In everyday social interactions, individuals can pause and reflect on their current mood to avoid relying on stereotypes in forming impressions.

FROM THEORY TO EVERYDAY LIFE

In practice

01

Hiring Interview Scenario

A happy job interviewer might rely on stereotypes about the candidate's university or background, while a sad interviewer might ask more probing questions to get individuating information.

02

Classroom Evaluation

A teacher in a good mood may assume students from certain groups are more capable, while a sad teacher may pay closer attention to each student's performance.

✳

A MOMENT TO REFLECT

Put it to work.

  1. When you are in a good mood, do you notice yourself making quicker, less detailed judgments about people? How could this affect your relationships?

  2. Think of a time when you were feeling sad and you carefully analyzed someone's behavior. Did you pay more attention to specific details rather than general assumptions?

  3. How can organizations train employees to recognize the influence of mood on stereotyping to improve fairness in evaluations and hiring?

Connected ideas

Another lens can bring the same problem into focus.

Often confused with

References

  1. — Brewer (1988)

CONTINUE THE CONVERSATION

Source texts

  • Heuristics and Biases The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (Thomas Gilovich, Dale Griffin, Daniel Kahneman)
← More cognitive biases