Skip to main content
Mental Models

Lateral Thinking (Assumption Breaking)

A problem-solving approach that involves challenging implicit assumptions and exploring unconventional solutions, often by breaking free from assumed constraints like linear sequence or planar arrangement.

THE IDEA

These solution notes challenge assumptions about sequence, rows, and stacking. The original problem statements and diagrams are not supplied, so the notes do not fully specify the required arrangements:

Solutions

  1. One way is shown on p. 89. This is a ‘circular’ arrangement in which each block has two touching neighbours — one in front and one behind.

  2. There is often some difficulty because it is assumed that the problem has to be solved in the sequence in which it was posed (i.e., one block to touch one other, one block to touch two others, one block to touch three others). If a start is made at the other end by making one block touch three others, then this arrangement can be progressively modified to give the arrangement shown.

  3. Some people have a lot of difficulty because they assume that all the blocks have to lie in the same plane. As soon as one breaks free of this assumption and starts to place the blocks on top of one another, one can reach the required arrangement.

  4. There is a surprising amount of difficulty. The usual mistake is to arrange the blocks in a long row. In such a row the end blocks touch only one other, but the middle blocks have two neighbours. The correct arrangement is very simple.

When to use it

  • Brainstorming sessions where teams are stuck on a conventional approach.

  • Product design when existing solutions seem impossible due to assumed constraints.

  • Personal decision-making when facing a dilemma with no obvious path forward.

FROM THEORY TO EVERYDAY LIFE

In practice

01

Block arrangement – circular thinking

In the circular arrangement described, each block has two touching neighbors, one in front and one behind. That observation does not satisfy a different requirement for a block to touch three others; the original diagrams are needed to reconstruct the separate tasks.

02

Block arrangement – 3D stacking

Challenging the assumption that all blocks must be on the same plane leads to stacking blocks on top of each other, achieving the required touching conditions.

03

Block arrangement – reverse sequence

Starting with the most constrained condition (one block touching three others) rather than the least constrained can unlock the solution.

✳

A MOMENT TO REFLECT

Put it to work.

  1. What assumptions am I making about this problem that might be limiting my options?

  2. Can I restate the problem in a way that removes an implicit constraint?

  3. What would happen if I deliberately broke one of my assumptions?

Connected ideas

Another lens can bring the same problem into focus.

Often confused with

CONTINUE THE CONVERSATION

Source texts

  • Lateral Thinking A Textbook of Creativity (Edward de Bono)
← More mental models