Skip to main content
Cognitive Biases

Burying the Evidence

Displaying successes while hiding failures can make an intervention appear more effective and less risky than it is. Taleb illustrates this selection problem with delayed harms from historical radiation treatments.

THE IDEA

BURYING THE EVIDENCE

Taleb argues that medicine can mislead when successes are displayed while failures disappear from view, sometimes because patients have died before the harm is recognized.

He gives a historical illustration of intervention bias. In the 1940s and 1950s, he reports, many children and teenagers received radiation for acne, thymus gland enlargement, tonsillitis, to remove birthmarks and treat ringworm of the scalp. In addition to the goiters and other late complications, approximately 7 percent of patients who received this radiation developed thyroid cancer two to four decades later. Taleb then speculates that low radiation doses might be protective and questions the motives behind sun-protection products. The passage provides no evidence establishing either claim. They do not follow from the evidence-selection argument or from the length of human exposure to sunlight.

When to use it

  • Evaluating the effectiveness of medical interventions by accounting for unpublished negative outcomes

  • Assessing historical events or technologies where failures are systematically underreported

  • Making personal health decisions by seeking balanced information on risks and benefits

  • Analyzing investment strategies that ignore losses while trumpeting gains

FROM THEORY TO EVERYDAY LIFE

In practice

01

Radiation treatment for childhood conditions

Taleb reports that children and teenagers received radiation for conditions such as acne and ringworm in the 1940s and 1950s, and that approximately 7% of those treated developed thyroid cancer decades later. His example concerns delayed harms that an initial record of treatment outcomes can miss.

✳

A MOMENT TO REFLECT

Put it to work.

  1. How might burying evidence affect your perception of medical treatments?

  2. Can you identify a situation in your field where successes are displayed but failures are hidden?

  3. What are the implications of intervention bias for policy making and personal decisions?

Connected ideas

Another lens can bring the same problem into focus.

CONTINUE THE CONVERSATION

Source texts

  • Antifragile (Nassim Nicholas Taleb)
← More cognitive biases