Skip to main content
Mental Models

Bookend the Future

A decision-making framework that involves considering a range of future outcomes from very bad to very good, and preparing for both extremes using premortems, preparades, and safety factors.

THE IDEA

Bookend the Future

Instead of relying on a single “point” forecast, consider a range of plausible outcomes and prepare for both bad results and unexpected success. In the book’s investment example, Penstock backed Coinstar after comparing its potential upside with its downside. One way to widen an overly narrow range is to ask “What’s an outcome so good/bad that there’s only a 10% chance of it being exceeded?” The question prompts a more explicit estimate; it does not guarantee an accurate one.

Identify the variables that matter, describe plausible outcomes at both ends of the range, and decide how you would respond. Include the middle, too: the purpose is to improve preparation, rather than to predict only extremes.

For the lower bookend, conduct a premortem: “It’s a year from now. Our decision has failed utterly. Why?” The book describes the 100,000 Homes Campaign using this approach to identify and address a legal vulnerability.

For the upper bookend, run a preparade: “It’s a year from now. We’re heroes. Will we be ready for success?” The Softsoap example describes its producer securing plastic pumps for 18 to 24 months in preparation for a national launch.

A safety factor adds capacity beyond the expected requirement. The book’s elevator-cable illustration uses a factor of 11; the appropriate margin in any real design depends on its requirements. Project schedules can likewise include time for delays, though a buffer cannot cover every possible failure.

Preparation can also change expectations. A “realistic job preview” shows the difficult parts of a role before someone accepts it, “vaccinating” the new hire against some avoidable disappointment. Sandra’s rehearsal of a request for a raise serves a similar purpose: she plans how to respond to awkward moments before entering the conversation.

When to use it

  • Strategic planning for a startup

  • Personal financial planning

  • Project management risk assessment

  • Career decision-making

  • When making a major investment, consider the range of possible returns and prepare for both loss and windfall.

  • When launching a new product, conduct a premortem to identify potential failures and a preparade to scale up for success.

  • When hiring, use a realistic job preview to set accurate expectations and reduce turnover.

  • When planning a project timeline, add a buffer factor to account for unexpected delays.

FROM THEORY TO EVERYDAY LIFE

In practice

01

Business Investment

Before investing in a new product, consider the best-case where it becomes a market leader and the worst-case where it fails completely. This helps in deciding how much to invest and what backup plans to have.

02

Personal Career Move

When considering a job offer, bookend the future by imagining the best outcome (rapid advancement, great culture) and worst outcome (layoffs, bad fit). This leads to a more balanced decision.

03

Investor Penstock and Coinstar

Penstock bet on Coinstar when his bookend analysis showed much more upside than downside.

04

100,000 Homes Campaign

Avoided a legal threat by using a premortem-style analysis.

05

Softsoap Producer

Locked down the supply of plastic pumps for 18 to 24 months to be ready for a huge national launch.

06

Elevator Cables

The book uses elevator cables made 11 times stronger than the expected load as an illustration of a safety factor, rather than a specification for every elevator.

07

Realistic Job Preview

Revealing a job's warts up front 'vaccinates' people against dissatisfaction.

08

Sandra's Rehearsal

Sandra rehearsed how she would ask her boss for a raise and what she'd say and do at various problem moments.

✳

A MOMENT TO REFLECT

Put it to work.

  1. What are the best and worst possible outcomes for a current decision you face?

  2. How can you prepare for both extremes without over-committing resources?

  3. What assumptions are you making that might be wrong?

  4. Which assumptions would have to hold for your best and worst plausible scenarios to occur?

  5. If your decision were to fail completely in a year, what would have caused it? (Premortem)

  6. If your decision were to succeed beyond expectations, what would you need to have in place to handle that success? (Preparade)

  7. What safety factors can you build into your plan to handle unforeseen events?

Connected ideas

Another lens can bring the same problem into focus.

Often confused with

CONTINUE THE CONVERSATION

Source texts

  • Decisive How to Make Better Choices in Life and Work (Chip Heath)
  • Decisive How to Make Better Choices in Life and Work (Chip Heath)
← More mental models