Skip to main content
Mental Models

Beasts of Habit

Grant reflects on sports rivalry as a learned ritual, using his own Michigan allegiance and the ship of Theseus to question inherited hostility. Team identity can endure while the people and stadium change.

THE IDEA

HYPOTHESIS 3: BEASTS OF HABIT

My all-time favorite commercial starts with a close-up of a man and a woman kissing. As the camera zooms out, you see that he’s wearing an Ohio State Buckeyes sweatshirt and she’s wearing a Michigan Wolverines T-shirt. The caption: “ Without sports, this wouldn’t be disgusting.”

As a lifelong Wolverine fan, I was raised to boo at Buckeye fans. My uncle filled his basement with Michigan paraphernalia, got up at 3:00 a.m. on Saturdays to start setting up for tailgates, and drove a van with the Michigan logo emblazoned on the side. When I went back home to Michigan for grad school and one of my college roommates started medical school at Ohio State, it was only natural for me to preach my school’s superiority by phone and prosecute his intelligence by text.

A few years ago, I got to know an unusually kind woman in her seventies who works with Holocaust survivors. Last summer, when she mentioned that she had gone to Ohio State, my first response was “yuck.” My next reaction was to be disgusted with myself. Who cares where she went to school half a century ago? How did I get programmed this way? Suddenly it seemed odd that anyone would hate a team at all.

In ancient Greece, Plutarch wrote of a wooden ship that Theseus sailed from Crete to Athens. To preserve the ship, as its old planks decayed, Athenians would replace them with new wood. Eventually all the planks had been replaced. It looked like the same ship, but none of its parts was the same. Was it still the same ship? Later, philosophers added a wrinkle: if you collected all the original planks and fashioned them into a ship, would that be the same ship?

The ship of Theseus has a lot in common with a sports franchise. If you hail from Boston, you might hate the 1920 Yankees for taking Babe Ruth or the 1978 Yankees for dashing your World Series hopes. Although the current team carries the same name, the pieces are different. The players are long gone. So are the managers and coaches. The stadium has been replaced. “ You’re actually rooting for the clothes,” Jerry Seinfeld quipped. “Fans will be so in love with a player, but if he goes to a different team, they boo him. This is the same human being in a different shirt; they hate him now. Boo! Different shirt! Boo!”

I think it’s a ritual. A fun but arbitrary ritual—a ceremony that we perform out of habit. We imprinted on it when we were young and impressionable, or were new to a city and looking for esprit de corps. Sure, there are moments where team loyalty does matter in our lives: it allows us to high-five acquaintances at bars and hug strangers at victory parades. It gives us a sense of solidarity. If you reflect on it, though, hating an opposing team is an accident of birth. If you had been born in New York instead of Boston, would you really hate the Yankees?

For our third approach, Tim and I recruited fans of the Red Sox and Yankees. To prove their allegiance, they had to correctly name one of their team’s players from a photo—and the last year his team had won the World Series. Then we took some steps to open their minds. First, to help them recognize the complexity of their own beliefs, we asked them to list three positives and three negatives about fans of the opposing team. The excerpt ends before the participants’ responses or the study’s results are supplied.

When to use it

  • When choosing a sports team to support, consider whether your attachment is based on arbitrary factors like birthplace or family tradition.

  • In marketing, leverage existing rivalries to create engagement, but be mindful of the arbitrary nature of these affiliations.

  • In diversity and inclusion training, use this concept to illustrate how arbitrary group memberships can lead to prejudice and to encourage reflection on ingroup bias.

  • When experiencing intense rivalry, take a step back to question whether the hatred is truly justified or merely a ritualistic habit.

FROM THEORY TO EVERYDAY LIFE

In practice

01

Michigan vs. Ohio State Rivalry

The author, raised as a Michigan fan, automatically booed Buckeye fans and felt disgust upon learning a kind woman attended Ohio State, despite it being half a century ago.

02

Seinfeld on Rooting for Clothes

Jerry Seinfeld observed that fans idolize a player on their team but boo the same person when he moves to another team, illustrating that loyalty is to the uniform, not the human.

✳

A MOMENT TO REFLECT

Put it to work.

  1. How might your own team loyalties be accidents of birth or early imprinting?

  2. Can you think of a time you disliked a player after they left your favorite team, even though they were the same person?

  3. If you had been born in a different city, how would your sports allegiances differ?

CONTINUE THE CONVERSATION

Source texts

  • Think Again The Power of Knowing What You Dont Know (Adam Grant)
← More mental models