Skip to main content
Mental Models

Anyone Can Change Wikipedia, Can’t They?

While anyone with internet access can edit most Wikipedia pages, edits from unfamiliar IPs are often reverted by bots, and many high-traffic or controversial pages are protected, requiring special privileges to edit.

THE IDEA

It’s true that anyone with a laptop and an internet connection can edit most Wikipedia pages. But that doesn’t mean the edits survive. If someone hasn’t registered with Wikipedia, chances are that person’s edits will be apprehended by tireless bots on the hunt for unfamiliar IP addresses. Plus, there’s a whole category of “protected pages.” They are often Wikipedia’s most trafficked and most controversial pages, the ones that enflame passions and bring out the worst human tendencies (entries like “Barack Obama,” “Donald Trump,” “Gamergate,” and “Causes of transsexuality,” to name some of the most recognizable entries, but also the “Coat of arms of Lithuania”—go figure). If you consult these articles, you’ll see some features you might not have noticed before. See that teeny lock to the right of “Donald Trump”? That tells you the page is protected. Also, did you notice that the “Edit” tab (which usually appears after the “Read” tab) has gone AWOL? Unless you already have Wikipedia editing privileges, you won’t be able to lay your hands on these pages.

Figure 7.1 Wikipedia article on Donald Trump showing lock icon (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump)

The system of locks is another way that Wikipedia has erected guardrails that prevent newbies, trolls, and just plain goofballs from making drive-by edits.[9] As Wikipedia maven Jake Orlowitz notes, it’s no big deal to say “I changed Wikipedia.” The real mark of achievement is “being able to say I made an edit to Wikipedia—and it stuck.”[10]

When to use it

  • When fact-checking controversial topics, understanding that Wikipedia pages may be protected helps evaluate the stability and reliability of the information.

  • For researchers studying online collaboration, the Wikipedia protection system shows how communities manage vandalism and maintain quality.

  • When designing a collaborative platform, considering similar protection mechanisms can help balance accessibility and content integrity.

FROM THEORY TO EVERYDAY LIFE

In practice

01

Editing the Donald Trump page on Wikipedia

Attempting to edit the Donald Trump page reveals a lock icon and no Edit tab unless the user has specific editing privileges, illustrating the system of page protection.

✳

A MOMENT TO REFLECT

Put it to work.

  1. How does the presence of bots and page protection affect the reliability and trustworthiness of Wikipedia?

  2. What are the trade-offs between openness and quality control on collaborative platforms like Wikipedia?

  3. In what ways might similar guardrails exist in other online communities or collaborative systems?

CONTINUE THE CONVERSATION

Source texts

  • Verified How to Think Straight, Get Duped Less, and Make Better Decisions about What to Believe Online (Mike Caulfield, Sam Wineburg)
← More mental models